Performing the Inferno: A Multimodal and Psychoanalytic Reading of The 8 Show as Contemporary Asian Spectacle
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.48048/ajac.2026.62Abstract
This article examines The 8 Show (Han, 2024) as a contemporary reimagining of Dante’s Inferno, reading its vertical architecture and spectacle of survival as an allegory of moral performativity in late capitalism. Integrating Multimodal Critical Discourse Analysis (MCDA) with Žižekian psychoanalysis, the study examines how visual design, spatial hierarchy, and libidinal economy create an ideological system in which sin functions as performance rather than transgression. The analysis situates The 8 Show within post-2020 Korean survival dramas, tracing how neoliberal precarity transforms morality into an adaptive, commodified practice. Through MCDA, the essay decodes the show’s multimodal semiotics of hierarchy and control; through psychoanalysis, it reveals the structures of enjoyment (jouissance) that sustain participation in ideological domination. The paper argues that The 8 Show replaces Dante’s fixed moral order with a fluid spectacle in which ethical identity is contingent on visibility, pleasure, and exchange. Ultimately, it proposes that the illusion of escape—the “afterlife” beyond the game—extends Hell into everyday life, where capitalism aestheticizes survival and spectatorship becomes complicity. In reframing sin as ideological performance, the essay contributes to theoretical discussions of morality, spectacle, and media within contemporary Asian cultural production.
Highlights
- Conducts a comparative reading of The 8 Show and Dante Alighieri’s Inferno, mapping each floor to an analogical circle of Hell within a contemporary capitalist order.
- Introduces an integrative framework combining Multimodal Critical Discourse Analysis (MCDA) and Žižekian psychoanalysis to interpret spatial design, narrative structure, and ideological performance.
- Reconceptualizes sin as mutable and performative, shaped by the spectacle of survival and the commodification of morality.
- Demonstrates how contestants are ideologically interpellated through enjoyment and self-exploitation, rendering them symbolically “already dead” within the spectacle.
- Exposes the “illusion of exit” at the show’s conclusion, where trauma, identity, and desire remain bound within post-Hell capitalist structures.
Downloads
References
Alighieri, D. (2024). Inferno. In Palma, M. (Trans.), The Divine Comedy. New York, USA: Liveright Publishing.
Althusser, L. (2016). Lenin and philosophy and other essays. New Delhi, India: Aakar Books. (Original work published 1971)
Althusser, L. (2018). From ideology and ideological state apparatuses (pp. 1285-1310). In Leitch, V. B., Cain, W. E., Finke, L. A., McGowan, J., Sharpley-Whiting, T. D., & Williams, J. J. (Eds.). The Norton Anthology of Theory and Criticism (3rd eds.). New York, USA: W.W. Norton & Company.
Auerbach, E. (2003). Mimesis: The representation of reality in Western literature (W. R. Trask, Trans.). New Jersey, USA: Princeton University Press.
Barolini, T. (1992). The undivine comedy: Detheologizing Dante. New Jersey, USA: Princeton University Press.
Butler, J. (1997). Excitable speech: A politics of the performative. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
Debord, G. (2021). The society of the spectacle (R. Adams, Trans.). Massachusetts, USA: Unredacted Word. (Original work published 1967)
ElleströmL. (2019). Transmedial narration: Narratives and stories in different media. London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
Fisher, M. (2022). Capitalist realism (2nd eds.). Winchester, UK: Zero Books.
Foucault, M. (2019). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison (A. Sheridan, Trans.). London, UK: Penguin Books. (Original work published 1975)
Han, B.-C. (2017). Psychopolitics: Neoliberalism and new technologies of power (E. Butler, Trans.). London, UK: Verso.
Han, J. (2024). The 8 Show [Series]. Netflix. APA 6 does not require a location for media material
Hawkins, P. S. (1999). Dante’s testaments: Essays in scriptural imagination. California, USA: Stanford University Press.
Hwang, D. (2021). Squid game [Series]. Netflix.
Jin, D. Y. (2015). Digital platforms, imperialism and political culture. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
Kress, G. R., & Van Leeuwen, T. (2020). Reading images: The grammar of visual design (3rd eds.). Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
Lacan, J. (2004). Écrits: A selection (B. Fink, Trans.). New York, USA: W.W. Norton & Co. (Original work published 1977)
Machin, D., & Mayr, A. (2023). How to do critical discourse analysis: A multimodal introduction (2nd eds.). California, USA: Sage.
Resende, V. de M. (2018). Decolonizing critical discourse studies: For a Latin American perspective. Critical Discourse Studies, 18, 26-42.
Robertson, R. (1995). Glocalization: Time–space and homogeneity–heterogeneity (pp. 25-44). In Featherstone, M., Lash, S., & Robertson, R. (Eds.). Global Modernities. California, USA: Sage.
Žižek, S. (1989). The sublime object of ideology. London, UK: Verso.
Žižek, S. (1991). Looking awry: An introduction to Jacques Lacan through popular culture. Massachusetts, USA: The MIT Press.
Žižek, S. (2002). Welcome to the desert of the real!: Five essays on 11 September and related dates. London, UK: Verso.
Žižek, S. (2008). Violence: Six sideways reflections. London, UK: Picador.
Žižek, S. (2009). The plague of fantasies. London, UK: Verso. (Original work published 1997)
Žižek, S. (2020). Hegel in a wired brain. London, UK: Bloomsbury Publishing.
Žižek, S. (2012). The year of dreaming dangerously. London, UK: Verso.
