Discourses on Earth and Maps in Contemporary Art from Female Artists

Authors

  • Omsiree Pandamrong Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences (Program in Visual Arts and Design), Valaya Alongkorn Rajabhat University under the Royal Patronage, Pathum Thani 13180, Thailand

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.48048/ajac.2027.173

Keywords:

Earth, Land, Maps, Surface and depth, Decay, Discourse, Binary opposition

Abstract

Since the end of World War II, the Earth’s environment has become an important subjects in art. The Earth and its representation, such as maps, have also been reconsidered and reinterpreted. Although a large number of artworks have been produced on these themes, academic analytical studies remain limited. Furthermore, there has been almost no research distinguishing works created by male and female artists, despite the fact that such issues are highly significant in the contemporary art world. This article aims to analyze the works of three female artists who focus on these issues. The study applies a method of “Discourse Analysis” within a “framework of knowledge,” following the approach of the French philosopher Michel Foucault. The findings reveal that these female artists construct discourses that encourage viewers to recognize “Binary Oppositions” related to the reinterpretation of the Earth, land, and maps from their own historical, social, and cultural perspectives. The three case studies highlight important issues presented as the following oppositions: 1. The opposition between digging deep into the Earth’s surface to reveal the history of existence and viewing the world as complete in itself in Michelle Stuart’s case. 2. The opposition between maps that are fragile and deteriorating, carrying specific cultural meanings, and maps that are generally considered permanent and enduring in Mona Hatoum’s case. 3. The opposition between cutting deeply into the Earth’s ground for viewers’ personal moments in time and vertically elevating forms into the air in a timeless manner in Maya Lin’s case. Beyond its potential for in-depth analysis of gender differences through a philosophical framework, this research also contributes an alternative approach to the analysis of visual art on the issues.

Highlights
• Identifies binary oppositions embedded in the artworks of Michelle Stuart, Maya Lin, and Mona Hatoum concerning Earth, land, and maps.
• Reveals how female artists construct alternative epistemological frameworks through place, memory, and lived experience.
• Despite employing different artistic media, the three artists share a common focus on interior space, transforming personal, historical, and cultural experiences into spatial narratives beyond conventional representations.
• Demonstrates how contemporary female artists challenge the monumental traditions of Land Art through intimate and experiential approaches to space.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bunbhob, B. (2017). The use of map in creating magical space in the work of Guillermo Kuitca. Veridian E-Journal,10(1), 2021–2038.

Cottington, D. (2011). Sinlapa samai mai: Khwamru chabap phokpha [Modern art: A very short introduction] (C. Triam-Anurak, Trans.). Bangkok, Thailand: Openbooks.

Fortenberry, D. (2017). The art museum. London, England: Phaidon Press.

Kido, R., Supanimit, P., Thaothong, P., Imamura, Y., & Isavorapant, C. (2023). The essence of things in modern art in 1970’s Japan and the cultural background: Case study of Mono-ha. Silpa Bhirasri, 11(2), 181-206.

Maya Lin Studio. (n.d.). Vietnam Veterans Memorial. Retrieved from https://www.mayalinstudio.com /memory-works/vietnam-veterans-memorial

Morrill, R. (Ed.). (2019). Great women artists. London, England: Phaidon Press.

National Gallery of Art. (n.d.). The boating party. Retrieved from https://www.nga.gov/artworks/ 46569-boating-party

Nochlin, L. (2002). Issues of gender in Cassatt and Eakins (pp. 299-305). In Eisenman, S. F. (Ed.). Nineteenth-century art: A critical history. London, England: Thames & Hudson.

Nochlin, L. (2021). Why have there been no great women artists? (50th Anniversary eds.). London, England: Thames & Hudson.

Prachakul, N. (2015). Foucault and the genealogy of modernity (pp. 9-12). In Foucault, M. (Ed.). Body under control: The chapter “Les corps dociles” from Surveiller et punir (T. Phokkatham, Trans., 3rd eds.). Bangkok, Thailand: Kobfai Publishing Project.

Sbitti, R. (2018). Mona Hatoum: Home and identity, from figure to frame and from frame to figure. Retrieved from https://www.manjm.org/blog/ 2018/2/18/mona-hatoum-home-and-identity-from-figure-to-frame-and-from-frame-to-figure

Tate Britain. (n.d.). Present tense. Retrieved from https://www.tate.org.uk/art/ artworks/hatoum-present-tense-t13867

The Metropolitan Museum of Art. (n.d.). Max schmitt in a single scull. Retrieved from https://www. metmuseum.org/art/collection /search/10819

Downloads

Published

2026-10-15

How to Cite

Pandamrong, O. (2026). Discourses on Earth and Maps in Contemporary Art from Female Artists. Asian Journal of Arts and Culture, 27(1), e173. https://doi.org/10.48048/ajac.2027.173